Friday, January 16, 2009
Unanswered questions...
I am repulsed by the thought of how the Brits treated us in our own country. How humiliating and exasperating that must have been. But at the same time I am stupefied as to why it took Indians such a long time to realize the atrocities and raise their voices against the self proclaimed landlords of this country? Is it because we try to adjust to anything and every situation- no matter how repulsive or unjustified? Why is it that we accept things the way they are and restrain ourselves from changing them? This ignorance is the "gap" that Nehru talks about in The Discovery of India. Referring to the Indian people he writes, "The people generally had grown apathetic and servile. There was thus a gap which had to be filled before any revolutionary change could take place. Perhaps this gap had been produced by the static nature of Indian society which refused to change in a changing world, for every civilization which resists change declines. That society, as constituted, had no more creative part to play. A change was overdue." We still seem to find bliss in the same ignorance. We might not be under the British rule anymore but are swayed by hard-boiled politics and apathetic politicians who threaten to consume us in their wild games. Why are we still not able to break out of the shell that binds us in many ways? What would it take to bring about a bigger and much needed change? Are we waiting for another revolution?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

3 comments:
"Is it because we try to adjust to anything and every situation- no matter how repulsive or unjustified?"
we are a "pleasing" lot. paper tigers. we can scream, shout, (over)populate and still be left out and pushed over.
i have been making my stand, albeit, slow and mostly alone. i have been warned. yeah, well, what are you gonna do at best - kill me? is that all?
"Are we waiting for another revolution?"
sometimes revolutions have to take a back seat, there are mouths to feed. cold hard fact.
when one has got not much to lose, things can appear clearer.
only if there is belief absolute and a very clear understanding of consequence will revolution have any meaning.
there were mouths to feed even before independence but then it was more about national pride. In a way nothing has changed. there's a different kind of freedom and and pride at stake. unfortunate part is that the government and law is dormant and ignorant.
I would like to quote Bhagat Singh here -
"The day we find a great number of men and women with this psychology who cannot devote themselves to anything else than the service of mankind and emancipation of the suffering humanity; that day shall inaugurate the era of liberty"
well all that changed in 1947 was the rule.. rest remained same at grass roots.. and it contines even today..
leaders like Bhagat singh were lost too early, leaders who looked for liberty of mankind.
Post a Comment